After outcry over baby’s apprehension, Manitoba Indigenous family gets their newborn back | CBC News

An Indigenous family is planning to pursue legal action after they say a newborn baby was apprehended by Child and Family Services without warning.

A taxi was on its way to bring the mother and baby home on Monday, when a child-welfare worker unexpectedly showed up at the Winnipeg hospital, the mother’s older sister said in an interview.

“It was a wrongful, illegal apprehension that happened when the baby had multiple homes she could go to, within the family,” she said.

The family posted video of their exchange with the child-welfare worker online, which made the rounds on social media and attracted the attention of politicians who brought up the family’s plight in the Manitoba Legislature on Thursday. 

That same afternoon, Child and Family Services met with the family and apologized for the apprehension, blaming it on miscommunication, the sister said.

The newborn was returned to their mother on Thursday night.

“She’s happy that the baby’s home, but she’s also still frustrated with how this all went about. This could have simply been avoided by proper communication,” her sister said. 

No members of the family can be identified under Manitoba law.

WATCH | Family tries to reason with child-welfare worker to prevent apprehension:

Manitoba family records newborn’s apprehension by CFS

The family of an Indigenous newborn protests when a CFS worker comes to apprehend the baby in a Winnipeg hospital. The infant has since been returned to the family.

The sister says the explanation given for taking away the newborn doesn’t make sense. It said the mother, who is 17 and a ward of CFS, wasn’t making efforts to enter parenting programs and that the family didn’t have a plan to care for the baby, which the family disputes.

She said the worker apologized on Thursday for the miscommunication and said it shouldn’t have happened. 

The provincial government didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment, but a spokesperson has previously said the province cannot comment on specific comments due to privacy concerns. 

NDP families critic Nahanni Fontaine said the family which dealt with the apprehension followed all the appropriate steps, and yet the child-welfare system still took their baby away. She brought up the family’s matter during question period Thursday. 

Fontaine told reporters afterwards that the older sister made arrangements for the mother and newborn to live with her. The sister also moved to a bigger place to ensure they had enough space.

“Here’s an Indigenous family that all came together to develop a kinship plan. Here’s an Indigenous young mom that did everything that she was supposed to do, and throughout this process there was no concerns that were advised or outlined to the family,” Fontaine said.

And yet, CFS still showed up with “no explanation,” she added.

“The family is rightly concerned and upset that this took place.”

Fontaine told reporters, before the reunification, the only possible resolution was for the baby to be returned to their mother.

Liberal Leader Dougald Lamont told question period the apprehension shows the tearing apart of Indigenous families, which occurred in residential schools, is not relegated to the past. 

“It’s not just intergenerational trauma,” he said. “It’s trauma that’s being created right now, affecting thousands of families.”

Number of apprehensions dropping

Families Minister Rochelle Squires said she couldn’t speak to specifics about the family’s case, but told question period on Thursday she instructed the General Child and Family Services Authority to oversee the matter and connect with the family.

She pointed out the number of babies being taken into care annually has decreased in recent years.

In 2018-19, 289 newborns were apprehended. That dropped to 84 apprehensions in 2021-22, the last fiscal year in which numbers are available, according to statistics provided Thursday by the province.

The government says the decision to end birth alerts in 2020 contributed to the declining number of babies taken into care. Birth alerts were the controversial practice of notifying hospitals and child-welfare agencies that a parent deemed high-risk would be having a baby.